SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

D.D.VYAS, CH.G.KRISHNAMURTHY, S.K.CHANDER
SHEO PRASAD SINGHAL – Appellant
Versus
INCOME-TAX OFFICER – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.P. Bhatnagar,Gujjarmal

ORDER

Per Shri D.D. Vyas, Judicial Member - This is an appeal by the assessee relating to the assessment year 1981-82. The facts of the case, in brief are as under :

2. The assessee is a contractor. Sometimes in August 1959, he obtained a contract for construction of an irrigation project in Rajasthan. Accor- ding to the assessee, the execution of this contract was completed in or about May 1963 and the past payment of Rs. 1,032.56 was received by the assessee on 11-5-1964. In January 1965, the assessee sent a notice under section 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908 read with sections 8 and 20 of the Indian Arbitration Act to the said State of Rajasthan, claiming that a sum of Rs. 1,20,130.50 was still due to him in respect of the aforesaid contract and that this amount together with interest of Rs. 11,820.30 should be paid to him or in the alternative the matter should be referred for arbitration. Thereafter, the matter was referred to an arbitrator who by his award dated 27-6-1972, held as under :

1. The defendant, the State of Rajasthan will pay to the claimant/plaintiff a sum of Rs. 1,21,139 for the balance payable to him in respect of the work done under the contract on Bithan

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top