SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

M.C.AGARWAL, ANAND PRAKASH
Hindustan Computers Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Income-tax Officer – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ajay Vohra, O.P. Vaish,N.B. Singh, B.K. Halder

ORDER

Per Shri M.C. Agarwal, Judicial Member - This is an assessee’s appeal against an order dated 26th December, 1986 passed by the Commissioner of Income-tax, Meerut, under section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 holding that the ITO wrongly allowed a deduction of Rs. 1,47,05,868 in computing the assessee’s income for assessment year 1984-85 and directing the ITO to make a fresh assessment withdrawing the said deduction.

2. We have heard the learned counsel for the assessee and the learned departmental representative and have perused the material placed before us.

3. The assessee is a manufacturer of computers and for that purpose it imports certain components on which it pays customs duty. The assessee has also to pay excise duty on the computers manufactured by it. In the year under consideration the accounting year for which ended on the 30th June, 1983, the assessee paid Rs. 3,38,96,607 towards custom duty and Rs. 58,90,731 towards excise duty. At the end of the accounting year the assessee had a closing stock valued at Rs. 4,36,41,459. In this valuation was included customs duty amounting to Rs. 1,24,31,024 in respect of imported components included in the closing stock and exc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top