SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

GEORGE CHERIYAN, T.N.C.RANGARAJAN
Income-tax Officer – Appellant
Versus
C. Jayantilal C. Shah – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.C. Mohanty,Ashok Kumbhat

ORDER

Per Shri George Cheriyan, Vice-President - This appeal is by the revenue. This appeal relates to the assessment year 1980-81. The assessee is a registered firm. The previous year is from October, 1978 to 20-10-1979.

2. One Sri Chandmal Chunilal was a partner in the assessee-firm till he passed away on 7-5-1977. Thereafter we gathered at the hearing that the firm was reconstituted. It was not a case of dissolution of the firm and succession thereto by another firm. In the reconstituted firm Smt. Dhako Bai, wife of late Chandmal Chunilal, became a partner along with three sons S/Shri Rakeshchand, Kevalchand and Kiranraj. The amount standing to the credit of late Chandmal Chunilal, who was assessed as an individual, was credited in an account in the firm under the style ‘estate of late Chandmal Chunilal’. Sri Chandmal Chunilal left behind a married daughter Smt. Saroj, who did not join the reconstituted firm. To the account styled ‘estate of late Chandmal Chunilal’ interest was credited, A question arose as to whether four-fifth of the interest so credited (i.e., excluding what would have been the share of Smt. Saroj) required to be added in the hands of the firm by virtue of sect

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top