SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

M.A.A.KHAN, J.K.VERMA
Badhar Khan – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Commissioner – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.K. Ojha,S.K. Kundra

ORDER

Per Shri M.A.A. Khan, JM. - This is an appeal by an assessee from the order of Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) Rajasthan-I. Jaipur dated 11-2-1982 confirming the order passed by the Deputy Commissioner (Asst.) under section 154 of IT Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as the Act) rejecting assessee’s application for modification of the adjustments made under section 143(1) of the Act.

2. The assessee, assessed in the status of Association of Persons (AOP). returned its income from its country made liquor business and Rum Business (IMF) at Rs. 50,05,190 for A.Y. 1990-91. Income at the above mentioned figure had been calculated in the following manner :—

(a) Country liquor business
Total purchase price
Rs.
Rs.
issue price
43,63,871.12
Empty Bottles &
Capsuling
69,73,326.60
Sales Tax
33,544.50
1,13,70.742
Profit @ 40%
under section 44AC
45,48,296
But profit as per books
being 5187048 being
more taken for tax
purposes
51,87,048
(b) Rum Business (IMF)
Loss as per computation
6,20,092
45,66,95

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top