SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

O.P.JAIN
Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax – Appellant
Versus
Subsea Offshore Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.K. Singh,A.V. Sonde

ORDER

Garg, A.M. - This is an appeal by the revenue against the order of the CIT(A) for assessment year 1986-87. The only ground raised in this appeal reads as under :

"On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the learned CIT(A) erred in holding that the D.C. was not justified in holding that assessee’s income is taxable in India. Further also erred in cancelling the assessment made under section 143(3) of the I.T. Act, 1961."

2. The assessee, a non-resident company incorporated in the United Kingdom, received Rs. 1,58,48,719 from Mazagaon Dock Ltd. in pursuance of an agreement dated 2-4-1985 and Rs. 98,39,380 from Oil & Natural Gas Commission vide agreement dated 29-8-1985. Under both the agreements, the assessee undertook the work of inspection and repairing of submarine pipeline networks, used in connection with oil and gas exploration, extraction and production with the help of a vessel, Special Remotely Operated Vehicles (hereinafter referred to as ‘ROV’), which performed the submarine work. Relying upon article 7(1), read with article 5(2)(h) and (i) of the Double Taxation agreement, the Assessing Officer held that the profit arising from these receipts is t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top