SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ABDUL RAZACK, P.S.KALSIAN
Tatia Skyline & Health Farms Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
V. Ramachandran, R.P. Madhu,R. Suresh

ORDER

Per Abdul Razack, Judicial Member - The assessee, a public limited company, filed the return declaring a loss of Rs. 59,63,119 worked out in the following manner :

 
 
 
Rs.
"Net profit as per P & L A/c.
 
 
1,29,26,869
Add : Items considered separately - Depreciation
 
 
37,760
 
 
 
1,29,64,629
Add : Inadmissible expenses Donation
 
 
1,29,601
 
 
 
1,30,94,230
Less : Depreciation under section 32
72,673
 
 
Deferred Revenue expdr.
1,89,84,676
 
 
under section 37
 
 
1,90,57,349
Assessable Loss
 
 
59,63,119"

  

     As is evident from the details of the computation statement, the assessee claimed a sum of Rs. 1,89,84,676 as deferred revenue expenditure. The Assessing Officer has stated that when the details were called for by him, it was represented to him that they were all public issue expenses and formed part of the total deferred revenue expenditure of Rs. 2,20,11,231 shown in the balance-sheet under Miscellaneous Expenditure. The Assessing Officer informed the assessee-company that the said expendi- ture of Rs. 1,89,84,676 was not allowable as public

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top