ABDUL RAZACK, P.S.KALSIAN
Tatia Skyline & Health Farms Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax – Respondent
Per Abdul Razack, Judicial Member - The assessee, a public limited company, filed the return declaring a loss of Rs. 59,63,119 worked out in the following manner :
| | | | Rs. |
| "Net profit as per P & L A/c. | | | 1,29,26,869 |
| Add : Items considered separately - Depreciation | | | 37,760 |
| | | | 1,29,64,629 |
| Add : Inadmissible expenses Donation | | | 1,29,601 |
| | | | 1,30,94,230 |
| Less : Depreciation under section 32 | 72,673 | | |
| Deferred Revenue expdr. | 1,89,84,676 | | |
| under section 37 | | | 1,90,57,349 |
| Assessable Loss | | | 59,63,119" |
As is evident from the details of the computation statement, the assessee claimed a sum of Rs. 1,89,84,676 as deferred revenue expenditure. The Assessing Officer has stated that when the details were called for by him, it was represented to him that they were all public issue expenses and formed part of the total deferred revenue expenditure of Rs. 2,20,11,231 shown in the balance-sheet under Miscellaneous Expenditure. The Assessing Officer informed the assessee-company that the said expendi- ture of Rs. 1,89,84,676 was not allowable as public
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.