SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

JOGINDER SINGH, DEEPAK R.SHAH
Infosys Technologies Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G. Sarangan,Amitab Kumar

ORDER

Per Bench - These appeals by an assessee is arising out of the common order of the CIT(A)-IV Bangalore dated 12-9-2000 against an order passed under section 201(1) and section 201(1A). Since common issues are involved therein all these three appeals are disposed by a consolidated order.

2. Though the assessee has raised as many as 20 grounds and various sub-grounds within the grounds, the only issue to be decided in this appeal is whether the assessee is liable to be treated as an assessee in default under section 201 of the Income-tax Act (hereinafter called Act) for failure to deduct tax as required under section 192 of the Act in respect of benefit, if any, accruing to its employees in respect of issue of shares under its Employees Stock Option Plan (ESOP) and consequently whether assessee is liable for payment of interest under section 201(1A) of the Act.

3. Infosys Technologies Ltd. is a public limited company in the Information Technology Industry. It has formulated an Employees Stock Option Plan (ESOP). A trust was set up by the Infosys Technologies Ltd. The Trust was allotted warrants of Re. 1 each, each warrant entitling the holder thereby to apply for and be allotted o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top