SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S.C.TIWARI, N.K.KARHAIL
Additional Commissioner of Income-tax – Appellant
Versus
Nestle India Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Lav Saksena,Reepal Jain, Dinesh Vyas, Ajay Vohra

ORDER-BY THE BENCH:

      Appeal in ITA No. 4545/Del./2000 is the appeal filed by the Revenue on 20th Nov., 2000, against the order of the CIT(A)-XXI, New Delhi, dated 31st Aug., 2000, in the case of the assessee in relation to order of assessment under section 143(3) for the asst. yr. 1997-98. In response, the assessee has filed on 12th Sept., 2002, a cross-objection numbered as CO No. 135/Del/2002. Appeal in ITA No. 2239/Del./2002 is the appeal filed by the assessee on 23 May, 2002, against the order of the CIT(A)-XVI, New Delhi, dated 21st Feb., 2002, in the case of the assessee in relation to assessment order under section 143(3) for the asst. yr. 1998-99.

2. As the common facts and disputes are involved in these appeals and the cross-objection, the same were argued together by the learned counsel for the assessee and the learned Departmental Representative. We are disposing them by this consolidated order for convenience.

3. The main dispute in these appeals pertains to the deduction claimed by the assessee-company on account of payments made to two companies, viz., Nestec Ltd. and Societe Des Produits, Nestle SA, hereinafter referred to as Nestec and SPN respectively. These two



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top