SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

K.P.T.THANGAL, PRAMOD KUMAR
Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax – Appellant
Versus
Papillon Invest. (P. ) Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.S. Venupany,J.D. Mistry

ORDER

Pramod Kumar, Accountant Member - The only grievance raised in this revenue’s appeal is as follows :

"deleting the addition of Rs. 1,86,95,362 made on account of Capital Gain arising out of the transfer of 1,05,000 shares of M/s. Morarjee Mills to M/s. Piramal Finance & Investments Pvt. Ltd., without considering the circumstances which indicate that the entire share capital of the assessee company is not held by M/s. Piramal Finance & Investment Pvt. Ltd."

2. The short issue that we are really required to decide, in order to adjudicate on the abovementioned ground of appeal is whether in order to avail exemption under section 47(v) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, entire share capital of a subsidiary company is required to be held only in the name of the holding company, or whether beneficial ownership of the entire share capital would suffice. Learned representatives agree on this proposition.

3. The controversy arises in this background. During the relevant previous year, the assessee company transferred 1,05,000 shares of Morarjee Mills to M/s. Piramal Finance & Investments Pvt. Ltd. (PFIPL, in short). The assessee’s contention was that since PFIPL is 100% subsidiary of the assess

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top