SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

N.K.KARHAIL, R.C.SHARMA
Escorts Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle 11(1), New Delhi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K. Bhatia, R.M. Mehta,L.M. Pandey

ORDER

R.C. Sharma, Accountant Member. - These are three appeals filed by the assessee against the separate orders of CIT (Appeals) dated 8-2-2003, 17-2-2003 and 8-2-2005 for the assessment years 2002-03, 2003-04 and 2001-02, in the matter of order passed under sections 154/143(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 wherein following grounds of appeal have been raised :

Grounds in ITA No. 2436/Delhi/05 :

"1. That the impugned appellate order dated 8-2-2003 (sic) passed by the learned CIT (Appeals) is bad in law and wrong on facts.

2. That on the facts, circumstances and legal position of the case, the learned CIT (Appeals) has erred in law in holding that the appellant has claimed credit for TDS for the first time by filing application under section 154 of the Income-tax Act dated 15-5-2004 and before that no claim for credit for TDS has been made at any point of time.

3. That on the facts, circumstances and legal position of the case, the learned CIT (Appeals) has erred in law in not allowing credit for tax deducted at source amounting to Rs. 2,18,15,062 attributable to interest income offered and subjected to tax in the year under appeal.

4. Without prejudice to Ground No. 3 hereinabove, the le

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top