DEEPAK R.SHAH, C.L.SETHI
Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle 48(1), New Delhi – Appellant
Versus
Vijay Gopal Jindal – Respondent
Deepak R. Shah, Accountant Member. - This appeal by the revenue is directed against the order of the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-XXI, New Delhi, dated 24-1-2003.
2. The revenue has raised following grounds before us :—
"1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the ld. CIT(A) has erred in deleting the addition of Rs. 18,32,50,000 without appreciating the fact that the addition has been made correctly on account of perquisite in the hands of the assessee.
2. The ld. CIT(A) has erred in holding that the perquisite on account of stock option arose to the assessee on 1-2-1999 falling in assessment year 1999-2000 i.e., the date of offer and not on 30-4-1999 falling in assessment year 2000-01 when the assessee actually exercised the option.
3. The CIT(A) has erred in holding that the option was exercised on 15-4-1999 but the perquisite value would not be taxable in assessment year 2000-01 as in the return filed by the assessee for the assessment year 1999-2000 the income on transaction had been offered for tax."
3. The assessee herein is an individual. At the relevant time he was working as managing director of M/s. Zee Telefilms Ltd. During the year the asse
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.