SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ABRAHAM P.GEORGE, D.MANMOHAN
Imomentum Technologies Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax-3(2), Mumbai – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.N. Inamdar,K.M. Verma

ORDER
Abraham P. George, Accountant Member. - This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against order under section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short "the Act") passed by the Commissioner of Income-tax-III, Mumbai, dated 5-1-2005, and relates to the assessment year 2001-02.

2. Assessee carrying on the business of development and export of information technology related software solutions, had during the relevant previous year claimed exemption of Rs. 65,75,677 under section 10A of the Act. Assessment was completed under section 143(3) and the Assessing Officer allowed the claim. However, CIT for a reasoning that the Assessing Officer had not examined the assessee’s claim of deduction under section 10A of the Act properly, issued notice under section 10A of the Act. According to the CIT, there was a change in ownership or the beneficial interest in the assessee-company during the relevant previous year thereby depriving it the benefit of deduction under section 10A of the Act. In reply to the notice, assessee contended that there was no change in the ownership nor beneficial interest. In support of this, the following shareholding pattern was submitted by the assessee :

(T

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top