SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

D.MANMOHAN, S.V.MEHROTRA, D.K.AGARWAL
Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax (International Taxation)-1(1), Mumbai – Appellant
Versus
Bank of Bahrain & Kuwait – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ajit Kumar Sinha,F.V. Irani

ORDER

S.V. Mehrotra, Accountant Member. - The present Special Bench has been constituted under section 255(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

2. The constitution of Special Bench resulted as under :

The assessee is a non-resident company carrying on banking business in India. It enters into forward contracts with its clients to buy or sell foreign exchange at an agreed price on a future date. On the date of maturity, the contract is executed which may result in the profits or losses to the assessee. There is no dispute between the parties in respect of losses arising on execution of the contracts within the same year. However, in some cases, the date of maturity of the contract falls beyond the end of the accounting period. In such cases, the assessee evaluates the unmatured forward contracts on the last day of the accounting period on the basis of rate of foreign exchange prevailing on that date and books the loss or profit, accordingly. This methodology was adopted keeping in view the guidelines laid down by the Reserve Bank of India as per rates notified by Foreign Exchange Dealers Association of India (FEDAI). The revenue’s stand is that in view of the decision of the Hon’ble Madras

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top