SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

R.K.GUPTA, SANJAY ARORA
Income-tax Officer, Ward TDS-2 – Appellant
Versus
Branch Manager, State Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Subhash Chandra,P.C. Parwal

ORDER

1. These are eight appeals and eight cross objections by department and assessee relating to assessment years 2004-405 to 2011-12 respectively.

2. Identical ground in all the appeals of the department are as under :-

"On the facts and in the circumstances of the case the ld. CIT (Appeals) has erred in deleting the demand raised under section 201(1)/201(1A) of the I.T. Act by the A.O. on account non-deduction of tax source by the assessee on payment of interest to the Rajasthan Rural Development Agency as the said agency is not covered under circular No. 4/2002 in respect of Boards or Bodies whose income is unconditionally exempt under section 10 of the IT Act, 1961, as claimed by the assessee before the ld. CIT (A)."

3. In the present cases, proceedings under section 201(1) and 201(1A) for assessment years 2004-05 to 2011-12 for non deduction of TDS on the interest paid by the assessee bank to Rajasthan Rural Road Development Agency (RRRDA), a body formed by the State Government, was initiated.

4. On survey by department, it was revealed that Rajasthan Rural Road Development Agency, a nodal agency was formed as a Society by the State Government. The Ministry of Rural Development,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top