SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

CHANDRA POOJARI, ASHA VIJAYARAGHAVAN
Sushee Hi Tech Constructions (P. ) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle-3(2), Hyderabad – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S. Rama Rao,D.D. Goyal

ORDER

Chandra Poojari, Accountant Member - All the above three appeals by the assessee are directed against the different orders of the CIT(A)-IV, Hyderabad for assessment years 2005-06 to 2007-08. Since common issues are involved, all the above three appeals are clubbed together, heard together and are being disposed of by this order for the sake of convenience.

2. The first common issue in all these three appeals is with regard to allowability of deduction u/s. 80-IA(4) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. According to the assessee, it has undertaken the development of irrigation canals and railway tracks including conversion of gauge and it is entitled for deduction u/s. 80-IA(4) of the Act.

Submissions by Authorised Representative of the assessee:

3. The counsel for the assessee submitted that insofar as the irrigation canals are concerned, they are the infrastructure facilities within the meaning of the Explanation. According to the Explanation the water supply project, water treatment system, irrigation project, sanitation and storage system, solid waste management system etc., form part of the infrastructure facility. The assessee also undertook the development of rail systems. Both the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top