SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

N.V.VASUDEVAN, JASON P.BOAZ
Karle International (P. ) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle 6(1), Bangalore – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Padamchand Khincha,S.K. Ambastha

ORDER

N.V. Vasudevan, Judicial Member - The Assessee is a partnership firm. It is engaged in the business of manufacture and export of ready-made garments. For AY 08-09, the Assessee filed return of income declaring total income of Rs. 12,89,760/-. The Assessee had three units. Unit-I is a Domestic Tariff Area (DTA) Unit. This unit was not entitled to any exemption. We will refer to this as a non-eligible unit. Unit II and Unit III were 100% Export Oriented Units eligible for exemption u/s.10-B of the Act. These units will be referred to as eligible units. The position of income and loss of the three units for the previous year was as follows:

Unit
Income/(Loss)
Unit-I
Rs.6,78,13,152
Unit-II
(Rs.6,22,40,143)
Loss
Unit-III
(Rs.42,83,248)
Loss

2. While filing the return of income, the Assessee set off losses of eligible units (Unit-II and III) against the profits of Unit-I, i.e., Rs. 6,78,13,152-6,65,23,391 (Rs. 6,22,40,143 + Rs. 42,83,248) and offered the balance sum of Rs. 12,89,761 to tax.

3. The AO held that income of eligible units that are entitled to exemption u/s.10-B of the Act will not form part of the total income under the A

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top