N.V.VASUDEVAN, JASON P.BOAZ
Karle International (P. ) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle 6(1), Bangalore – Respondent
N.V. Vasudevan, Judicial Member - The Assessee is a partnership firm. It is engaged in the business of manufacture and export of ready-made garments. For AY 08-09, the Assessee filed return of income declaring total income of Rs. 12,89,760/-. The Assessee had three units. Unit-I is a Domestic Tariff Area (DTA) Unit. This unit was not entitled to any exemption. We will refer to this as a non-eligible unit. Unit II and Unit III were 100% Export Oriented Units eligible for exemption u/s.10-B of the Act. These units will be referred to as eligible units. The position of income and loss of the three units for the previous year was as follows:
| Unit | Income/(Loss) | |
| Unit-I | Rs.6,78,13,152 | |
| Unit-II | (Rs.6,22,40,143) | Loss |
| Unit-III | (Rs.42,83,248) | Loss |
2. While filing the return of income, the Assessee set off losses of eligible units (Unit-II and III) against the profits of Unit-I, i.e., Rs. 6,78,13,152-6,65,23,391 (Rs. 6,22,40,143 + Rs. 42,83,248) and offered the balance sum of Rs. 12,89,761 to tax.
3. The AO held that income of eligible units that are entitled to exemption u/s.10-B of the Act will not form part of the total income under the A
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.