SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

G.D.AGRAWAL, CHANDRA MOHAN GARG
Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax – Appellant
Versus
Kapil Dev – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Tarun Seem,K. Sampath, Raj Kumar

ORDER

ITA Nos.4788 & 4789/Del/2003

G. D. Agrawal, Vice President - These appeals by the Revenue are directed against the order of learned CIT(A)-II, New Delhi dated 4th July, 2003 for the assessment years 1992-93 & 1993-94.

2. The common ground raised in these appeals by the Revenue reads as under:-

"On the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Id.CIT(A) erred in annulling the Asstt. by ignoring the fact that no Asstt. was made in this case u/s 143(3) therefore reference to provision to section 147is not called for."

3. The facts of the case are that in both the years, the assessments were reopened under Section 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and against such order of reassessment, the assessee had filed the appeal before the learned CIT(A) who had cancelled the reopening of assessment and, consequently, had annulled the assessment order. Against the order of learned CIT(A), the Revenue was before the ITAT. The ITAT, vide order dated 15th February, 2006 in ITA Nos.4787 to 4789/Del/2003, upheld the order of learned CIT(A) and dismissed the appeals filed by the Revenue. On appeal by the Revenue, Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court remitted the matter to the ITAT with the following

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top