G.C.GUPTA, MUKUL KR.SHRAWAT, N.S.SAINI
Alkaben B. Patel – Appellant
Versus
Income-tax Officer, Ward -14(2), Ahmedabad – Respondent
Mukul Kumar Shrawat, Judicial Member - This Special Bench has been constituted vide an order U/s 255(3) of the I.T.Act (hereinafter mentioned as The Act) by the Hon'ble President, I.T.A.T. The question referred to us is reproduced below:
"Whether for the purpose of Section 54EC of IT Act, 1961, the period of investment of six months should be reckoned after the date of transfer or from the end of the month in which transfer of capital asset took place?"
1.1 It is desirable, as well, to reproduce the Grounds of Appeal raised by the assessee, as under :
'The Ld. CIT(A)-XXI, Ahmedabad has grossly erred in law and in facts in confirming the disallowance of legitimate investment made U/s 54 EC of Rs. 45,00,000/-. The Ld. A.O. may be directed to allow the legitimate deduction in respect of investment if NHAI Bonds U/s 54 EC of Rs. 45,00,000/-.
2. The Ld. CIT(A)-XXI, Ahmedabad has grossly erred in law in considering the last date for investment U/s 54EC as 10.12.2008 in place of 31.12.2008 as the 'month' would mean that the "full month" which reckoned from the end of the month in which transfer takes place. Therefore, he may be directed to consider the last date for making investment U/
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.