SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SUSHMA CHOWLA, G.S.PANNU
Kancast (P. ) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Income-tax Officer, Ward 9 (3), Pune – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Nilesh Khandelwal,Rajesh Damor

ORDER

G. S. Pannu, Accountant Member - The captioned appeal by the assessee is directed against an order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-V, Pune dated 21.07.2011 which, in turn, has arisen from an order dated 31.12.2008 passed by the Assessing Officer u/s 143(3) of the Income-tax Act,1961 (in short "the Act") pertaining to the assessment year 2006-07.

2. In this appeal, assessee has raised the following Grounds of Appeal :—

"1. On facts and circumstances prevailing in the case and as per provisions of the law and scheme & norms it be held that, the assessment order communicated and served to the appellant after 31st Dec, 2008 is barred by limitation and is not effective & operative in the eyes of law. The order served on the appellant after prescribed time limit be set aside.

2. On facts and circumstances prevailing in the case and as per provisions of the law it be held that, the AO has erred in taxing the amount of Rs.4,89,89,000/- as long term capital gains on transfer of leasehold rights in respect of MIDC land by applying provisions of section 50C as against long term capital gain of Rs.1,90,11,120/- declared and admitted by the appellant under this head. The action of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top