SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

T.K.JAYARAMAN, M.V.RAVINDRAN
Stanzen Toyotetsu India (P. ) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Central Excise, Bangalore-III – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N. Anand,Mrs. Sudha Koka

ORDER

M.V. Ravindran, Judicial Member. - All these four appeals are directed against Orders-in-Appeal No. 132/2007, dated 17-12-2007; OIA Nos. 133 & 134/2007, dated 17-12-2007 & OIA No. 128/2007, dated 24-12-2007 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals-II), Bangalore. Since all these appeals are in respect of the same assessee and issue being the same, they are being disposed of by a common order.

2. The relevant fact that arise for consideration are the appellant herein availed input stage credit of the service tax amount paid by the service provider of Canteen Services, Rent-a-Cab Services and on the Group Health Insurance Services. The appellant claims that the canteen services, transportation charges for transportation of their employees and the Group Insurance health Policy for which they have paid Service tax to the service providers, is in or in relation to the manufacturing activity. Both the lower authorities have held that the appellants are not eligible to avail the credit of Service tax paid by the Service provider and confirmed the demand and also imposed penalty besides directing the appellants to pay interest. Hence, these appeals.

3. The learned Advocate

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top