SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

P.KARTHIKEYAN, P.G.CHACKO
La Freightlift (P) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Service Tax, Chennai – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.C. Anand,V.V. Hariharan

ORDER

P.G. Chacko, Judicial Member - After examining the records and hearing both sides, we note that the Commissioner has demanded service tax of over Rs. 93 lakhs along with education cess of over Rs. 1.4 lakhs from the appellants for the period 1-7-2005 to 30-9-2006 and has also imposed on them penalties. Service Tax of Rs. 16,22,329/-, education cess of Rs. 32,541/- and interest of Rs. 15,915/- were paid during the course of investigations, a fact noted in the Commissioner’s order. The impugned demand is under the category of ‘Business Auxiliary Services’. More precisely, it is on an amount earned by the assessee during the above period towards what has been found by the Commissioner to be ‘commission’ for the sale of space for cargo in aircrafts belonging to various airlines in terms of agreements entered into with them. It is submitted by the learned Consultant that the amounts paid by the appellants during the investigative stage are for the normal period of one year with reference to the date of the relevant show-cause notice. We note that these payments were not made under protest. In the circumstances, for the present purpose, the appellants cannot claim prima facie case a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top