ARCHANA WADHWA
Chitrita Virnave – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Central Excise – Respondent
Per Smt. Archana Wadhwa, Judicial Member - Inasmuch as the issue involved in all the four appeals is identical, I take up the Stay Petitions as well as the Appeals together.
2. Nobody has appeared on behalf of the appellants. Accordingly, I have heard Shri A.K. Mondal, Ld. JDR for the Revenue and have gone through the impugned orders passed by the authorities below.
3. The challenge in the appeal is only of the imposition of personal penalties of varied amounts imposed upon the appellants who are Architects by profession. As per facts on record, I find that the Service Tax was imposed on rendered Architects with effect from 16th October, 1998. Thereafter, the appellants got themselves registered with the Central Excise authorities. However, the Service Tax was not deposited by them for certain quarters and ST-3 returns were not filed for the said period. The appellants’ defence is that the provisions of Service Tax in respect of Architects were stayed by the Hon’ble High Court of Madras on the Writ Petition filed by "The Indian Institute of Architects" on behalf of its Members. As such, the Service Tax were not being paid by them. However, as soon as, the appellants came to k
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.