SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

P.G.CHACKO, M.VEERAIYAN
I. C. Financial Analysts of India – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise, Hyderabad-II – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
V. Sridharan, G. Shivadass,P.R.V. Ramanan, R.K. Singla

ORDER

P.G. Chacko, Judicial Member - The first four appeals were filed by the respective assessees against a common order passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Hyderabad-Il. These appeals are directed against demands of service tax and education cess (with interest) confirmed against the assessees and penalties imposed on them by the adjudicating authority. The demands of service tax are under the head "commercial training or coaching service" and for the periods shown below :

Appeal No.AppellantPeriodService tax + education cess demandedPenalties
S.T./32/2007The ICFAI Society, Hyderabad7/2003 to 3/2005 Rs. 18.92 crores Rs. 18.92 crores u/s 78 Rs. 1000/- u/s 77 Rs. 150 per day u/s 76 .
S.T./39/2007The ICFAI University, Dehradun12/2003 to 3/2005 Rs. 8,69,716/- Rs. 8,69,716 u/s 78 Rs. 1000/- u/s 77 Rs. 150 per day u/s 76
S.T./40/2007 The ICFAIAN Foundation, Hyderabad 7/2003 to 3/2005 Rs. 9.44 cr. Rs. 9.44 cr. u/s 78 Rs. 1000/- u/s 77 Rs. 150 per day u/s 76
ST./46/2007The ICFAI University, Tripura8/2004 to 3/2005 Rs. 1,62,205/- Rs. 1,62,205/- u/s78 Rs. 1000/- u/s 77 Rs. 150 per day u/s 76

The two appeals of the Department are directed against different orders passed by the Co

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top