SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

S.N.JHA
Commissioner of Central Excise, Ludhiana – Appellant
Versus
Indian Special Castings (P. ) Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sumit Kumar,Pawan Kumar

ORDER

Per Justice S.N. Jha : This appeal by the Revenue arises from the order-in-appeal of Commissioner (Appeals), Central Excise, Ludhiana dated 26.12.2005 setting aside the order-in-original of the Adjudicating authority dated 25.8.2005. By the said order, the Assistant Commissioner as Adjudicating authority disallowed credit of Rs. 1,83,445/- and directed recovery of the amount under Rule 57I (1) (ii) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 read with Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 with interest under Section 11AB of the Act read with Rule 57I (5) of the Rules, 1944. Penalty of equal amount was also imposed under Rule 173Q (1) (bb) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 read with Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

2. The respondent who is a manufacturer of excisable goods had contravened the provisions of Rules 57AC and 57AE of the Central Excise (Amendment) (Second Amendment) Rules, 2000 as applicable during the relevant period by wrongly availing modvat credit amounting to Rs. 1,83,445/- on the basis of sham invoices issued by M/s HBR Steel Corporation. Show cause notice was issued in this regard after visit of the business premises of M/s. HBR Steel Corporation by t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top