SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

P.G.CHACKO, P.KARTHIKEYAN
Varnica Herbs – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Central Excise, Pondicherry – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N. Venkataraman, M.N. Bharathi,B.L. Meena

ORDER

Per P.G. Chacko : The appellant is engaged in the manufacture of hair dyes falling under SH 3305.99 of the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. These products have been notified under Section 4A of the Central Excise Act for the purpose of valuation.

2. During the period of dispute, the appellant had cleared Indica Herbal Powder Hair Dye on payment of duty based on assessable value determined under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act. During most part of the period, they had also cleared Chick Kali Mehendi Powder Hair Dye on payment of duty likewise. The "Indica" hair dye was cleared in mono-cartons, each containing 6 sachets of 8 grams each of the commodity. The other hair dye was also cleared in mono-cartons, but each containing 10 sachets of 4 grams each of the commodity. All the clearances were made to a dealer namely M/s. Cavinkare Pvt. Ltd. The appellant considered each sachet as a retail pack and, as the net weight of hair dye contained therein was less than 20 grams, they claimed exemption (under Rule 34 (1) (b) of the Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 1977) from the application of other provisions of the said Rules to the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top