JYOTI BALASUNDARAM, C.SATAPATHY, T.ANJANEYULU, K.K.AGARWAL
Commissioner of Central Excise, Ahmedabad – Appellant
Versus
Pioma Industries – Respondent
Per Jyoti Balasundaram : The respondents herein who are manufacturers of Soft Drink Concentrate (hereinafter referred to as SDC) falling under CETA Sub-heading 2108.99 filed declaration effective from 2.6.1998 under Rule 173-B of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 claiming benefit of Notification No. 5/98-CE dt. 2.6.1998 at Serial No. 7 of the Table thereto which provides concessional rate of duty at the rate of 8% to preparations in the nature of instant food mix falling under Chapter Heading 2108, for the product. It appeared to the Excise authorities that the product was not a food mix and therefore the benefit of Notification would not be admissible and that the product would attract Central Excise duty at the Tariff rate of 18%. For the period from June 1998 to February 1999, the respondents had cleared SDC on payment of duty at the concessional rate of 8% and therefore they had short levied and short paid differential duty at the rate of 10%. Hence, show cause notices dt. 21.12.98 and 22.4.99 were issued proposing modification of the declaration by denying the benefit of the notification, and proposing recovery of differential duty of Rs. 27,79,540/- and Rs. 99,73,245/- resp
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.