SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

P.G.CHACKO, P.KARTHIKEYAN
Commissioner of Customs, Tuticorin – Appellant
Versus
DCW Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Smt. R. Bhaghya Devi,C. Seethapathy

ORDER

Per P.G. Chacko : These appeals filed by the Department are against orders passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) holding that amounts equivalent to Basic Customs Duty (BCD) debited in DEPB licence were not to be taken into account for the purpose of levy of education cess under Section 84 of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2004. The respondents had imported furnace oil, Vinyl Chloride Monomer (VCM) calcium carbide and cleared the same through Tuticorin Port. The Basic Customs Duty on these goods were debited in DEPB scrips in terms of Notification No. 96/2004-Cus. dated 17.9.2004. Under Section 84 of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2004, education cess at the rate of 2% was to be levied and collected by the Department on the above imports. A dispute arose between the assessee and the Department in this connection. The Department wanted to levy the cess at the rate of 2% on the aggregate of Basic Customs Duty and Additional Customs Duty (CVD) which were debited in the DEPB scrips. The assessee objected, by contending that the debits of BCD and CVD in DEPB licence (scrip) was not a 'levy' of the duties and therefore the above cess was not leviable as a percentage of the amount so debited ina

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top