SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

JYOTI BALASUNDARAM, S.S.SEKHON
Ramayan Impex – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Customs (Exports) Sheva – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Hari Shankar, S.N. Kantawala,Ajay Saxena

ORDER

Per S.S. Sekhon :

The appellants are regular exporters of goods and had filed 2 Shipping Bills both dated 6.3.2003 for export of 120 packages of fabrics declared as 100% polyester filament yarn/texturised yarn with or without embroidery under DEPB Scheme. The fabrics were wrapped around cardboard sheets rolled in the length of more than 20 yards per roll. The total FOB value declared was Rs. 75,65,471.29.

1.2 On 11.3.2003, through their Custom House Agent, they filed an application requesting the goods to be returned 'back to town'.

1.3 However, on 12.03.03 the goods were examined by the Customs authorities and it was alleged that the said goods were rags/chindis instead of fabrics as declared and they were grossly overvalued as per the FOB declaration. Enquiries were conducted and statements were recorded and a Show Cause Notice dated 13.7.2004 was issued calling upon the exporters to show cause:

(i) why the goods covered under the two Shipping Bills should not be confiscated under Section 113 (h) (ii) of the Customs Act, 1962;

(ii) A penalty under Section 114 of the Customs Act, 1962 should not be imposed;

(iii) Why the credit of DEPB benefit amounting to Rs. 8,32,200/- should not

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top