SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

P.S.BAJAJ
Padmini Polymers Ltd – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Customs, New Delhi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
C. Harishankar,P.M. Rao

ORDER

Per P.S. Bajaj : The above captioned appeals have been directed by the appellants against the impugned orders-in-original vide which the Commissioner of Customs as adjudicating authority has imposed penalties on them as detailed therein, under Section 112 of the Customs Act.

2. I have heard both the sides. From the record, it is evident that appellants filed certain Bills of Entry for import of in all 22 CD ROMs declaring as Multimedia Application Software, on CD ROMs from California and Singapore, and claimed benefit under S.No. 173 of Notification No. 11/97 dated 1.4.97, which exempted completely computer software from payment of duty. On examination, it revealed that the goods had been over-invoiced, with intent to drain out for more foreign exchange, from the country, and on that account, penalties had been imposed on the appellant-company, M/s. Padmini Polymers (in short, PPL) as well as on its Chairman and the Directors as detailed in the impugned order. But in my view, the impugned order of the Ld. Commissioner, cannot be sustained. It is quite clear from the record that immediately, after the examination of the goods, the appellants, informed the suppliers that the good

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top