SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S.S.KANG, V.K.AGRAWAL
Commissioner of Central Excise, Daman – Appellant
Versus
Kraftech Products Inc. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.C. Pushkarna,R. Ravindran

ORDER

Per V.K. Agrawal : The issue involved in this appeal, filed by the Revenue, is whether the Central Excise duty is payable by M/s. Kraftech Products Inc. on the assessable value determined under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act as claimed by Respondents or with reference to M.R.P. under Section 4A of the Central Excise Act as claimed by the Revenue.

2. Shri S.C. Pushkarna, learned D.R., submitted that the Respondents manufacture 'Godrej Permanent Powder Hair Dye' and "Godrej Kali Mehndi'' that they were packing these products in multi-piece packages and were clearing to their sole buyer M/s Godrej Soaps Ltd.; that a show cause notice dated 13.7.2000 was issued to the Respondents for assessing the multi-piece packages under the provisions of Section 4A of the Central Excise Act on the ground that multi-piece packages even if having the total weight of contents of all commodities less than 10 gms., required a declaration under Rule 17 of the Standards of Weights & Measures (packaged Commodities) Rules, 1977 (In short PCR, 1977) and were not eligible for exemption under Rule 34(b) of PCR, 1977; that the Commissioner, under the impugned Order, has held that the provisions of Rule

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top