SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

K.K.USHA, S.S.KANG, C.N.B.NAIR
Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-III – Appellant
Versus
Machino Montell (I) Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K. Ray,D.N. Mehta, V.M. Verma

ORDER

Per Justice K.K. Usha : The issue raised for consideration before the Larger Bench is whether penalty under Section 11AC is liable to be imposed on the assessee or whether interest under Section 11AB is liable to be levied on duty, in cases where the duty has been deposited by the assessee before issue of show cause notice. It is contended by the ld. counsel on behalf of the assessee that since they have deposited the duty amount before issue of show-cause notice, penalty under Section 11AC can not be imposed. In support of the above contention, reliance was placed on the following decisions of the Tribunal:-

(1) Ashok Leyland Ltd. Vs. CCE, Chennai [2003 (55) RLT 816 (CEGAT-Chennai)]

(2) Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Ltd. Vs. CCE [2002 (54) RLT 317 (CEGAT-Ban.)=2003 (161) ELT 285 (Tribunal-Bang.)]

2. The Revenue, on the other hand, submitted that when fraud, collusion or wilful mis-statement or suppression of facts, etc. are alleged against the assessee, penalty under Section 11AC can be imposed irrespective of the fact that the assessee has deposited the duty before issue of show cause notice. In support of their contention, reliance was placed on the following three decisions:-

(1) E

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top