SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

S.L.PEERAN, JEET RAM KAIT
Nazar Thakumpet – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Customs, Chennai – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B. Satish Sunder,C. Mani

ORDER

Per S.L. Peeran : The appellant is an importer of second-hand Mitusubishi car. The appellant had returned to India from Dubai on transfer of residence and filed necessary documents to show that the car was exported from Dubai in his name. He sought for clearance of the same and to grant of the benefit of Public Notice No. 3 (RE-2000)/1997-2002 dated 31.3.2000 [reported in 2000 (37) RLT M109]. However, the authorities have not conceded to the request and held that the vehicle was not in his name and, therefore, the same cannot be granted. They have ordered for confiscation and imposed RF of Rs. 2.5 lakhs and penalty of Rs. 1 lakhs. The matter was heard on more than one occasion and the department was also called upon to file a report in the matter. The plea raised by the Counsel in the case is that the notification does not lay down any condition that the vehicle had to be registered in the appellant's name. He submits that the only criteria that the notification laid down was that "all such imports shall carry a "No Sale" condition of 2 years which shall be endorsed by the Customs Authorities on the passport/registration documents at the time of import and by the Regional Tran

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top