G.RAGHURAM, RAKESH KUMAR
Commissioner of Service Tax, Delhi – Appellant
Versus
Ms. Shriya Saran – Respondent
Rakesh Kumar, Technical Member - The facts leading to filing of this appeal by Revenue are, in brief, as under.
1.1 The respondent is a popular Cine Actress residing at Mumbai. She has taken service tax registration at Delhi and has been paying service tax on renting of immovable property since 2007-08 onwards. The officers of Directorate General of Central Excise Intelligence, on receipt of an intelligence that she has earned huge amount in connection with advertisement or promotion of the products/services of her clients, directed her vide letter dated 12/05/11 to furnish the details regarding the payments received in connection with advertisement/promotion of products, the details of the service tax paid and service tax returns filed. The respondent vide her letter dated 18/05/11 stated that she is engaged in brand promotion which is taxable since 01/07/10 and that prior to 01/07/10 she had not provided any taxable service other than renting of immovable property (since 01/06/07). From subsequent inquiry it appeared that she had entered into agreements with M/s Hindustan Lever Ltd., M/s Colgate Palmolive, M/s TTK Healthcare Ltd., M/s Saravana Jewellers, M/s Bhima Jewellers,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.