K.S.VENKATARAMANI, S.L.PEERAN
T. T. K. Pharma Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise – Respondent
S.L. Peeran, Member (J)
1. The appellants are aggrieved with the Order-in-Appeal passed by Collector (Appeals), Bangalore upholding their claim for classification of the product Try Snack Foods called Fryums' under Chapter Heading 21 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 but has denied the benefit of the Notification No. 12/90-C.E., dated 20-3-1990. The learned Collector (Appeals) has negatived the contention of the appellants that the product in question is 'Namkeens'. He has held that "the term Namkeen as used in the notification would denote only such of these items which are ready to eat. The examples cited, that is, Bhujiya and Chabena only clarify the situation that both these products are in a ready to eat condition and do not require any further processing except opening and eating. Fryums or namkeens, manufactured by the appellants would not be covered by the notification. The appellants' product requires to be fried before it can be eaten. They are, therefore, not eligible for the benefit of Notification No. 12/90. The appeal is accordingly disposed of."
2. The appellant has given the various steps in the process of manufacture of the Fryums as follows :-
"Step 1 : Raw mat
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.