SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

P.C.JAIN, JYOTI BALASUNDARAM
Nirma Chemical Works – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D. Dave, Jitendra Singh, Uday Joshi, Rajesh Kumar,L.N. Murthy

ORDER

Jyoti Balasundaram, Member (J)

1. All three appeals involve common issues and were hence heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. The brief facts of the case are as follows :

2. M/s. Nirma Chemicals Works Ltd. (Appellants in E/1885-1886/91-C and respondents in E/1728/91-C are engaged in the manufacture of organic service active products and preparations in cake form, viz. Nirma Cake and organic service active agent and washing preparation in powder form viz. Nirma Detergent Powder and Acid Slurry all falling under Chapter 34 of the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and are licence holders for the manufacture of Nitrobenzene Acid Slurry and detergent powder. They had opted for availing Modvat credit under the provisions of Rule 57G of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. In the Modvat declaration they have declared sulphuric acid/oleum, etc. falling under sub-heading 2807.00 as one of the raw materials and started availing of the credit of duty paid on such goods received by them in accordance with the provisions of Rule 57A. During the process of manufacture of Nitrobenzene and Acid Slurry certain quantity of sulphuric acid commonly known a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top