SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

D.C.MANDAL, P.C.JAIN, JYOTI BALASUNDARAM
Real Drinks (P. ) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
V.A. Naik,Rajesh Dhingra

ORDER

P.C. Jain, Member (T)

1. Since common issues are involved in both the appeals a common order is being passed.

2. Brief facts of the case are as follows :-

2.1 The appellants herein are manufacturers of Aerated waters, namely soda and sweetened drinks falling under Tariff Item No. 1-D. They filed a classification list No. 8/83, dated 1-3-1983 in respect of financial year 1983-84 and another classification list No. 5/84, dated nil in respect of the financial year 1984-85. In both these classification lists the appellants claimed the exemption under Notification No. 148/82-CE dated 22-4-1982 (as amended) and while claiming the exemption the appellants declared their clearance values at Rs. 12,95,395.21 p during the financial year 1982-83, and at Rs. 11,15,631.54p during the financial year 1983-84.

2.2 During the course of verification of the appellants' sales invoices by the departmental officers, it was noticed by them that the total turnover of soda and sweetened drinks were Rs. 24,99,557.05 p during the financial year 1982-83, excluding sales tax, Central Excise duty and actual transportation cost. At this stage, it may be mentioned that what constitutes transportation cost is in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top