SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S.KALYANAM, V.P.GULATI
Collector of Central Excise – Appellant
Versus
Mysore Lac and Paint Works Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.B. Vedantham

ORDER

V.P. Gulati, Member (T)

1. This appeal has been filed by the Collector of Central Excise, Bangalore, against the order of the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), Madras, dated 22-5-1989. The appellant-Collector is aggrieved of the findings of the Collector (Appeals) holding that the respondents were eligible to take additional MODVAT credit after they discovered their mistake that they had taken a lower credit after the receipt of the goods in the factory. The learned Collector (Appeals) has held as under:-

"In the absence of restriction in the Central Excise Rules, the appellants are eligible to take credit as per specific provisions of Rule 57-B read with Notification No. 175/86. The credit of duty taken on receipt of the inputs, if not correct, the correct amount can be taken or balance amount taken subsequently, especially in the same month when the inputs were received by the assessee. I do not find any provision in Central Excise Rules, which forbids such taking of credit in RG. 23A account by the manufacturer. As such, the order of the Assistant Collector is set aside and the appeal is allowed for the reasons stated above."

2. The appellant-Collector has urged the follo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top