S.KALYANAM, V.P.GULATI
Larsen and Toubro Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise – Respondent
V.P. Gulati, Member
1. This appeal is against the order of the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), Madras. The learned Collector (Appeals) denied the benefit of MODVAT credit in respect of oxygen and acetylene gas used by the appellants in the manufacture of the specified finished product under Rule 57A. The learned Collector (Appeals) has held as under in this regard:
As regards the gases, I am unable to agree with the appellants view that oxygen and acetylene should also merit Modvat credit. Cutting torch is basically an appliance used for cutting and welding. The gases are primarily used in the cutting torch, which falls in the excluded category of inputs under Rule 57-A as the gases used along with the cutting torch have also disqualify for the credit.
2. The learned Counsel for the appellants pleaded that this Bench of the Tribunal as also the East Regional Bench, Calcutta have allowed the benefit of Modvat credit in respect of Oxygen and Acetylene gas used in the manufacture of specified finished product under similar circumstances.
3. The learned SDR concedes that the matter is covered against the Revenue. He has no specific plea to make in this regard.
4. We observe that
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.