Back
HARISH CHANDER, V.RAJAMANICKAM
Indian Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise – Respondent
V. Rajamanickam, Member (T)
1. The Ld. Advocate for the appellants Shri N. Mookherjee stated that the appellants were manufacturers of iron and steel products particularly Castings, besides Spun Pipes from Steel Melting Scrap, Pig Iron etc. The castings were further processed for the purpose of repair/maintenance of the existing machineries in the factory of the petitioner at 'Burnpur'. Prior to the introduction of the new Tariff their goods were classified under Tariff Item-58 and were exempted. Since no provision was made under the new Tariff for exemption, representations were made and consequently Notification No. 281/86 dated 24-04-1986 was issued. The Notification exempts all excisable goods produced and used within the same factory or other factory of same manufacturer for repairs or maintenance of machinery. The Assistant Collector in his Order dated 29-07-1987 has come to the conclusion that the Notification refers to workshop within a factory and held that it connotes "a tool-room" sort of thing, where only the goods other than those which are primarily intended for manufacture by the factory as their prime production or one of principal raw-materials/inputs for capti
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
