SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

K.L.REKHI, HARISH CHANDER, P.C.JAIN
Mahavir Products – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.B. Gujral,J.N. Nigam

ORDER

1. When this appeal came up for hearing on 22-9-1988, the appellants made a preliminary point that the proceedings before the Collector, who had passed the impugned order aforesaid, were without jurisdiction and that the three show cause notices issued to the appellants by the authorities were null and void. The Bench heard both sides on the preliminary point and reserved orders thereon. The following order recorded by the Bench disposes of the preliminary point of the appellants.

The facts, insofar as they are material for disposal of the preliminary point, are that during the course of a survey of the Industrial Estate, in which the appellant unit is located, Central Excise Officers noticed that the appellants were engaged in manufacture of forged brass shapes and Sections [falling under Item 26A (3) (ii) of the erstwhile Central Excise Tariff] without a Central Excise Licence and that they had been removing the said articles without payment of Central Excise duty and without following the statutory Central Excise requirements. After investigations, the authorities served the following three show cause notices on the appellants :

(1) Show cause notice dated 6-10-1985 for the p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top