SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

P.C.JAIN
Collector of Central Excise – Appellant
Versus
Kapsons Electro Stampings – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Nisha Chaturvedi,K.R. Chopra

ORDER

P.C. Jain, Member (T)

1. Since a common question is involved in all the three appeals, a common order is being passed.

2. Short question involved in these appeals is whether the MODVAT credit taken by the respondents herein in terms of Government of India's order F.No. B-22/5/86-TRU, dt. 7.4.1986 on steel sheets purchased from the open market from dealers of iron and steel products is permissible or not. The department contends, as a common ground of appeal, that the said deemed credit taken by the respondents herein is not admissible because the M.S. sheets are wholly exempted from duty under Notification 208/83, dated 1.8.1983 (as amended) and therefore, such M.S. sheets on which deemed credit has been taken by the respondents are clearly recognisable as non-duty paid and hence in terms of proviso (ii) to para 2 of Government of India's aforesaid order dated 7.4.1986 would apply making the credit Inadmissible.

The respondent company, on the other hand, contends inter alia, that the Notification 208/83, dated 1.8.1983 (as amended) does not give unconditional exemption, inter alia, to M.S. sheets. Before the sheets can be taken as wholly exempted under the said notification eithe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top