V.T.RAGHAVACHARI, D.C.MANDAL
Steel Authority of India Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise – Respondent
D.C. Mandal, Member (T)
1. Brief facts of the case are that the appellants generated electricity in their own plant and also purchased electricity from D.V.C. The electricity generated by them and also that purchased from D.V.C. got mixed up in a common grid before the same was consumed in the appellants' own plant as well as in the township outside the appellants' generating plant. The appellants did not pay Central Excise duty on the electricity generated by them and claimed that no duty was payable by them on the said electricity under Notification No. 52/78-CE, dated 1.3.1978. Under this Notification, electricity was exempted from Central Excise duty provided it was proved to the satisfaction of the Assistant Collector of Central Excise that such electricity was produced by the generating station, Industrial Unit or an establishment, and is subsequently used in such generating station including Auxiliary Plant, if any. A show cause notice dated 2.1.1982 was issued to the appellants asking them to explain why Central Excise duty on electricity consumed during the period from 1.3.1978 to 31.10.1981, should not be recovered under Rule 9(2) and why penalty should not be imposed

Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.