SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S.D.JHA, D.C.MANDAL
Collector of Central Excise – Appellant
Versus
Sudhakar Litho Printers – Respondent


ORDER

D.C. Mandal, Member

1. As these appeals relate to a common issue the same were heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. Issue to be decided is whether cinema wall posters are classifiable under item 68 or item 17(2) of the Central Excise Tariff and the value of clearances thereof should be included in the aggregate value of clearances of all excisable goods for the purpose of benefit of the exemption under notifications No. 71/78-CE dated 1-3-1978 and No. 80/80-CE dated 19-6-1980 in respect of the clearances of playing cards falling under item 56 of the Central Excise Tariff.

2. The Assistant Collector of Central Excise held that cinema wall posters were not converted type of paper and were correctly classifiable under item 68 of the Central Excise Tariff instead of item 17(2) ibid. The value of clearances of cinema wall posters should, therefore, be included in the aggregate value of clearances of excisable goods for the purpose of exemption under notification No. 71/78-CE dated 1-3-1978 and No. 80/80-CE dated 19-6-1980. As a result, the aggregate value of clearances of all excisable goods exceeded Rs. 20 lakhs during the preceding financial year. He, ther

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top