SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

S.KALYANAM, K.S.VENKATARAMANI
Collector of Central Excise – Appellant
Versus
Indian Aluminium Company Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.K. Bhatia,N. Mukherjee

ORDER

K.S. Venkataramani, Member (T)

1. This is an application seeking stay of the operation of the order dated 29.2.88 passed by the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), Madras by which he had set aside the order of the Assistant Collector, Belgaum Division, dated 13.10.87 and held that the respondents herein are entitled to MODVAT credit on intermediate products manufactured by them. Since the issue involved in the appeal itself lies in a short compass and is to be taken up for disposal to-day, the Stay Application is dismissed.

2. Appeal No. E/318/88/MAS. - This appeal has been preferred by the Collector of Central Excise, Belgaum against the impugned order of the Collector of Appeals referred to above. The respondents manufacture Aluminium. They filed declaration under Rule 57G of the Central Excise Rules opting to work under the MODVAT Scheme. They declared recovered Cryolite and Soderburg paste as inputs for the final product, namely, Calcined Alumina. The inputs namely, Cryolite and Sunderburg pasts, are manufactured by them and captively used in producing the final product. They also paid duty on the inputs so captively consumed. Since there was no exemption for such captive

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top