SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

I.J.RAO, G.P.AGARWAL
Collector of Customs, Bombay – Appellant
Versus
Presto Works – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J. Gopinath,V. Lakshmikumaran

ORDER

I.J. Rao, Member (T)

1. This is an appeal from the Collector of Customs, Bombay, against the impugned order of the Collector of Customs (Appeals), Bombay. Briefly, the facts of the matter are that the respondents imported certain bearings and bushes, under a Bill of Entry, for warehousing under Import Department Serial No. 002027 dated 6.6.1980. The goods were classified for purposes of assessment Under H. 84.63 of the CIA as it then stood. After the assessment of the Bill of Entry, the goods were allowed to be warehoused under Sections 59 & 60 of the Customs Act, 1962. The importers had imported total 9 cases of goods and removed 4 cases against the Bill of Entry No. 78 dated 24.11.1980 and another Bill of Entry No. 2105 dated 7.1.1981. On 18.6.1981, the importers filed a Bill of Entry for Ex-Bond clearance for home-consumption for the two remaining cases. These goods were also assessed under H. 84.63 CTA and were allowed clearance on payment of duty.

2. Meanwhile, with effect from 1.3.1981, H. . 84.63 of BTN was split into sub-heading (1) & (2). The rate of duty for sub-heading (1) was 60% + 20% whereas for sub-heading (2), the rate of duty was revised . to 100% + 25%. The dep

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top