SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

G.SANKARAN, V.T.RAGHAVACHARI
Collector of Central Excise, Calcutta – Appellant
Versus
Inchek Tyres Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Dolly Saxena

ORDER

V.T. Raghavachari, Member

1. Under notice dated 26-4-1982 a demand was made on the Respondents M/s. Inchek Tyres Ltd. for payment of duty under Tariff Item 68 Central Excise Tariff on scrap of tyres and tubes removed by them without payment of duty during the period 4-5-1975 to 9-12-1978. The respondents denied liability claiming that such scrap was not an excisable product. By order dated 29-6-1982 the Deputy Collector of Central Excise, Calcutta held that the scrap was liable for payment of duty under Tariff Item 68 Central Excise Tariff but, in confirming the demand, restricted it to the period 26-4-1977 to 9-12-1978 holding that the demand for the earlier period was barred by time. He further imposed a penalty of Rs. 2,000/-. On appeal the said order was set aside by the Collector (Appeals) under order dated 29-11-1982. This appeal by the Collector of Central Excise, Calcutta is against the said order.

2. None appeared today on behalf of the respondents in spite of issue of notice. We have heard Smt. Saxena for the Department and have perused the records.

3. From the orders of the lower authorities it transpires that the scrap on which duty was demanded arose in two ways (1)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top