SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

H.R.SYIEM, M.SANTHANAM
Kamal Cold Storage (P. ) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise, Bombay – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
V. Zutshi

ORDER

M. Santhanam, Member (J)

1. The Appeal is filed against the order of the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), Bombay, dated 27.11.1982. The Appellants brought two K-30 x 110 Ammonia Compressors bearing Serial Nos. 830326 and 830332, falling under Tariff Item 29A(3), from M/s. Kirloskar Pneumatic Company Ltd., Pune, on payment of full duty under regular Gate passes. On 20.1.1979 the Appellants lodged a claim for refund of Rs. " 33.408/-. The Compressors had been actually used for the cold storage within one year of the date of clearance as required under Notification 132/68 dated 13.6.1968. The Appellants secured L-6 Licence and C.T.-2 certificate from the appropriate authorities on 10.11.1978. Chapter X procedure could not be followed prior to the removal of the compressors. The notification has used the words "As far as may be the procedure specified in Chapter X of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 is followed". The Assistant Collector rejected the refund on the ground that the procedure contemplated in Chapter X had not been followed in that L-6 licence and C.T.-2 certificate were not obtained before the clearance. The Appellate Collector also rejected the Appeal.

2. The Appe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top