Back
CUSTOMS, EXCISE AND GOLD (CONTROL) APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI
S.D. JHA, K. Prakash Anand, JJ.
Collector of Central Excise, Vadodara -Appellant
Versus
Dura Foam Industries -Respondent
Order No. 833/87-C
Decided On : 20-10-1987
S.D. Jha, Vice-President (J)
1. After the delay in filing the appeal was condoned, the matter being simple and parties having no objection, the appeal itself was taken up for consideration on merits.
2. Shri G.V. Naik, Jt. Chief Departmental Representative for the appellants and Shri V. Lakshmi Kumaran, Advocate for the respondents were heard and papers perused.
3. It is observed that by the impugned order, the Collector (Appeals) classified Top skin, Bottom skin, Side skin, Shreadings and Foam Cut pieces under sub-heading 3921.90 - Other - Residuary item. We observe that for this waste and scrap, Heading 39.15, sub-heading 3915.00 "Waste, paring and scrap of plastics" is specifically there in Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and this should have been the proper classification. In fact, Shri Lakshmi Kumaran, Advocate for the respondents also agrees that this would be the proper classification of the goods in question.
4. We, therefore, set aside the classification of Top Skin, Bottom Skin, Side Skin, Shreadings and Foam Cut pieces under heading 3921.90 and substitute sub-heading 3915.00 of the Tariff Act for the same. The order is modified to this extent. The appeal is thus allowed.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
