G.SANKARAN, V.T.RAGHAVACHARI
Collector of Central Excise, Madras – Appellant
Versus
Madras Rubber Factory Ltd. – Respondent
V.T. Raghavachari, Member (J)
1. Since the issue involved in these three appeals is common they were heard together. The said issue relates to eligibility of benefit under Notification No. 201/79 to M/s. Madras Rubber Factory Ltd. in respect of duty paid by them on rubber process oil, renacit-VII and Stearic acid, consumed by them in the manufacture of masticated rubber in their Kottayam factory, which masticated rubber they removed to their other factories at Madras, Arkonam and Goa for further manufacture of rubber tyres and other rubber products. Their request in this regard had been turned down by the Collector of Central Excise, Madras under his orders dated 17.11.1980 and 20.10.1980 but on appeal the said orders had been set aside by the Central Board of Excise and Customs. The Central Government was of the view that the said order of the Central Board was not proper, legal and correct. Accordingly, notice dated 21.12.1981 was issued by the Central Government under Section 36(2) of the Central Excises and Salt Act. The proceedings so initiated were subsequently transferred to this Tribunal and the same is the subject matter of appeal No. 1413/ 81 -D. The other two appeals
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.