SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

D.C.MANDAL, K.S.VENKATARAMANI, M.GOURI SHANKER MURTHY
I. T. C. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise, Madras – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.N. Haksar, P.K. Ram,P.K. Ajwani

ORDER

D.C. Mandal, Member (T)

1. By this appeal, the appellants have challenged the Order-in-Appeal passed by the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals) confirming the Order-in-original C. No. V/17/17/37/82 dated 13.4.1983 passed by Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Madras.

2. The facts of the case in brief, are that the appellants manufacture, inter alia, printed cartons, shells, bulls and printed cut outs for cigarette packets. They submitted 3 price lists dated 5.9.1982, 5.9.1982 and 6.9.1982 respectively declaring the value of their products under Section 4 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 and claiming deductions therefrom on account of "cost of durable and returnable corrugated fibre cardboard containers." The Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Madras III Division disallowed the deductions claimed by the appellants. An appeal filed against that order was rejected by the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals) by the impugned order.

3. The appeal filed before the Collector (Appeals) was on the same ground as before the Assistant Collector. But during the hearing before the Collector, the appellants introduced a new ground that as per the judgment of the Supreme Court

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top